sunoxen

Random possibilities of movement...

The Graying Western Mind?

Is Google Making Us Stupid?

I think the most interesting point of this article is that point made by the playwright Richard Foreman.

He says :

“I come from a tradition of Western culture, in which the ideal (my ideal) was the complex, dense and “cathedral-like” structure of the highly educated and articulate personality—a man or woman who carried inside themselves a personally constructed and unique version of the entire heritage of the West. [But now] I see within us all (myself included) the replacement of complex inner density with a new kind of self—evolving under the pressure of information overload and the technology of the “instantly available.”

I think what the interesting is that while Foreman’s anxieties may be correct, there has always been this assumption within some bits of the creative community that technology, and in particular the internet deluge of instant on information will destroy culture.

I would argue that in fact it will make insight more rare and needed than that instant fix. We cannot put the Google mindfuck back in the bottle, but we can simply point out the premises of the Western tradition that will not die no matter the rewiring that goes on. And most importantly, create for the context of the rewiring, not burrow in a hole hoping that upon emergence, we will be back in the 1930’s again.

The point is that while the internet has broadened our access to information, it severely lacks the tools to express individual insight. Sure, we can have these personal visceral moments in social media and elsewhere, but the depth of these thoughts is usually on the level of “I’m going for a piss, I just broke up, and I love the new sandwich shop.”

But I don’t have any fear that new mediums will arise that will focus primarily on expressing something very simple, and for lack of a better term, human. What is inescapable throughout human history from the drama competitions in Greece to texting preference to American Idol is that we need insight and connection more than we need information. But some may just not know it yet.

An actress friend of mine, Maya, is involved with a theater group in London called Punchdrunk which I think is directing this head on. They immerse the googled mind into something outside of its range to compute, and forces that mind and soul to be apart of an experience, much like Breht or Gortowski. That the physical, now that it has gone into a web haze of slumber, can now have the advantage of playing of those sleepy expectations. This is an opportunity, not a detriment. 

But just like Everest, only a few people can experience Punchdrunk. The key will be to use the web in ways that can capture something contrary and shifted from the logic of the google search. (Which BTW, isn’t the end all, be all of web experiences.)

So I don’t fear for the human need to smash this perception to bits when it starts to encroach on our very instincts for survival through connection. Just deal with it, and do something about it, don’t moan about it.

Utility of CC Licences

I think the key here is the word “utility.” With any business model, there has to be purpose, but I think there’s a point in which the faith of the check appearing in the mail must be suspect.

I worked for a couple of dotcoms who had a similar faith strategy, and they failed.

He’s correct that the CC license is a wondrous thing, but it’s not to the point where quality content can necessarily grow from free. I think the “old model” is right in the supposition that people will pay for value, and whether that value is inscribed in community, sentiment, real politique, or passing fancy or cult, people are a base realize that there is no free lunch.

I think what will be interesting in the next few years is to see Creative Commons, and open source techniques, used in a way that can protect the creators of a hit and translating that success to the marketplace. (See South Park “imaginary money” episode)

Bait and Switch works in his case, but in order to really build something important, there has to be implied and implicit value. Not just a google ad, an amazon referral, and a prayer. 1 to 1 has to be the answer.

My Take on Gould's Personal Ad.

The Original from Glenn Gould:

Wanted

Friendly, companionably reclusive, socially unacceptable, alcoholically abstemious, tirelessly talkative, zealously unzealous, spiritually intense, minimally turquoise, maximally ecstatic moon, seeks moth or moths with similar qualities for purposes of telephonic seduction, Tristanesque trip-taking, and permanent flame-fluttering, no photos required, financial status immaterial, all ages and non-competitive vocations considered, applicants should furnish sets of sample conversation with notarized certification of marital disinclination, references re: low decibel vocal consistency, itinerary and sample receipts from previous successfully completed out-of-town moth flights, all submissions treated confidentially… 

And my take:

Wanted

Friendly, secretive, conspicuously and lovingly toxic, socially selective and somewhat redundant, alcoholically furtive, unrepentantly inquisitive, tirelessly seductive, unzealously zealous, spiritually tangled and humanistically skeptical, minimally concerned with trinkets, maximally instinctive in direction, seeks another life lived in continuum with similar qualities for purposes of seduction of the mind, instruction to your soul, and all remaining human instincts and flickers left unchecked. Financial status immaterial, nationality inconsequential, education always in wanting, canine collaborus, tired legs from hiking towards no particular destination, cautiously beautiful, and beautifully optimistic, fearless in integrity, and fearful of nothing but the dead air of ignorant sameness and agreement, appreciative of solitude, but needing all benefit of human contact and sharing, Alice-ly curious, and musically literate with implicit depth of scope (to even be open to the occasional biyearly country song), independent of the constant mirror and ego-boosting text message, yet able to dazzle in contained moments. Must be accepting of those that eat meat and are not evil, and that eating nothing but derivatives of corn is not only harmful, but quite boring. In short, able to jump headfirst into something without a guide and know that the inner strength will guide you through. If that is a faith in self, without reliance on platitude, then so be it. You’d ask of the moth, “what did you see?”

All submissions treated confidentially. Trading card photos appreciated. Writing sample even more so. Submissions will be responded to swiftly and professionally. Coffee consuming and conversation not out of range of possibility. Butterfly catching. Etc.

His best speech yet.

My Heroes…

My Heroes…

The main reason that Bill Clinton  and his wife need to go away

A spin I took around Robert Smithson’s seminal work Spiral Jetty in October, 2006.